By harism
on Wed, 11/14/2012 - 17:54
Hi, there's most likely a trivial answer to this question but I wasn't able to figure it out by myself. Why samples do use custom EGLConfigChooser instead of basic;
GLSurfaceView.setEGLContextClientVersion(1 or 2); GLSurfaceView.setEGLConfigChooser(red, green, blue, alpha, depth, stencil);
Why samples use custom EGLCOnfigChooser?
Hi, in the samples we use our own ConfigChooser because that offers a bit more flexibility than using the "standard" approach you refer to;
Why samples use custom EGLCOnfigChooser?
Hi, I see. I have to admit I'm still a bit puzzled and expected there might be some device related issues causing this design decision.
Why samples use custom EGLCOnfigChooser?
Hi harism, you are actually right, indeed the default implementation does not differ that much from the one of the samples
(especially the bit depth criteria are the same as in the custom one, as you correctly pointed out);